首页> 外文OA文献 >Implementation of the Polluter-Pays Principle (PPP) in local transport policy
【2h】

Implementation of the Polluter-Pays Principle (PPP) in local transport policy

机译:在当地交通政策中执行污染者付费原则(PPP)

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Previous research has highlighted significant socio-environmental inequalities in the UK and elsewhere. A city's greatest polluters typically reside in affluent suburban communities located along the city's periphery, while those creating the least emissions reside in central locations, and most likely experience the largest associated health burdens. Using the culturally diverse city of Leicester as a study case, and building on Mitchell and Dorling's (2003) localised form of the Polluter Pays Principle, we investigate this environmental injustice. A pattern detection analysis of localised intra-urban interactions was undertaken using a ‘Local Indicators of Spatial Association’ (LISA) modelling approach of high resolution census data, Driver Vehicle Licensing Agency (DVLA) records, road transport emission maps and geocoded hospital admissions records provided by the NHS Leicester City Primary Care Trust. Pearson's R statistics identified an inverse correlation between mobile polluters and communities characterised as either socially (− 0.78) or environmentally burdened (− 0.34), confirming the existence of environmental inequalities. While some inner-city communities moderately contribute towards their environmental burden, these contributions were substantially outweighed by those made by external communities, whom appear to avoid the social, environment and physical cost of their actions. In contrast to their more affluent counterparts, residents of less affluent areas tend to use ‘greener’ and more active transport options, although any associated health benefits appear largely offset by increased periods of environmental exposure. Strong signs of spatial structuring within the modelling framework, suggest there may be a need to tailor travel schemes to local populaces. For example, in affluent areas where less environmentally friendly transport options tend to be adopted, options based on local carpool schemes may be more amenable than those based on enhanced public services.
机译:先前的研究强调了英国和其他地区的重大社会环境不平等现象。一个城市的最大污染者通常居住在城市外围的富裕郊区社区,而那些排放量最少的城市则居住在中心位置,最有可能遭受最大的相关健康负担。以莱斯特文化多元的城市为研究案例,并以米切尔和多林(Mitchell and Dorling,2003)的污染者付费原则的本地化形式为基础,我们研究了这种环境不公。使用高分辨率普查数据,驾驶执照颁发机构(DVLA)记录,道路运输排放图和经过地理编码的医院入院记录的“空间协会局部指标”(LISA)建模方法,对局部城市内部互动进行了模式检测分析由NHS莱斯特市初级保健基金会提供。皮尔森(Pearson)的R统计数据确定了流动污染者与以社会(-0.78)或环境负担(-0.34)为特征的社区之间的反相关关系,从而确认了环境不平等的存在。尽管一些内城区社区为减轻其环境负担做出了适度的贡献,但这些贡献大大超过了外部社区所做的贡献,外部社区似乎避免了其行动的社会,环境和物质成本。与富裕地区相比,富裕地区的居民倾向于使用“更绿色”和更积极的交通方式,尽管与健康相关的任何好处似乎都被环境暴露时间的延长所抵消。在建模框架内强烈的空间结构迹象表明,可能需要针对当地居民量身定制出行方案。例如,在较富裕的地区,倾向于采用对环境不太友好的交通选择,与基于增强的公共服务的选择相比,基于当地拼车计划的选择可能更易接受。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号